Epitaph
"The Earth's Geodynamo is Dead"
Obituary
The exact date of birth can not be exactly determined because its existence was created on
doubtful theories before the turn of the 20th Century. When the theory of the
earth's magnetic field was generally accepted world wide around 1963, the condition of
this theory further deteriorated until the 1998 Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical
Union in San Francisco, California. At this meeting it was announced by Eugene D. Richard
that the end had come. It could not survive with the amount of current required to produce
this field. Also the ability to reverse fields by a switching action contributed to
its demise. Now about the theory concerning the geodynamo. They are explained in a paper,
written by Paul H. Roberts, of the University of California, in 1992. There
are two premises, one a homopolar dynamo, and the other a two-disk dynamo. Both are
wrong. My theory is explained in my e-book on my websites.
It is survived by a countless number of theses written by aspiring young scientist hoping
to make a name for themselves in the field of geophysics. It is also survived by many Ph.
Ds trying to get that ultimate goal, the Nobel Prize. In spite of the disappointment
of the survivors, there is solace in the fact that the best scientist of the past could
not unlock the secrets associated with the earth's magnetic field. This includes
Albert Einstein and many others. It also includes 2000 hours on a super computer
that finally had one reversal, which is not a complete cycle of reversals.
Predictions should never be taken at face value. They must be
verified by competent modern authority. An example of this is the Laser
Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) which is located in Livingston,
Louisiana and Hanford, Washington. Together these two facilities cost $365 million
and are to verify the existence of gravity waves predicted by Albert Einstein's General
Theory of Relativity of 1916. ("LIGO's Mission of Gravity", Science, 27 April
2000, page 420, Vol. 288 No. 5465)
In the final analysis one must not look to the past but must look to the present for
authority. This is true not only in science but also in philosophy, medicine, law,
and religion.